Same answer, and it won't change by advancing the stage number. Stage 5 is the article itself, which is the part of this that would be the criminal advertisement.
There's also no approved plan to follow. I declined Stages 0–2, declined Stage 3, and Stage 4 was skipped. "Following the approved plan" would mean inventing a raw-fact base, licence details, tested deposit and withdrawal times, and support channels for an operator whose legal entity, licence number and official domain the research could not establish. The methodology block alone would be fabricated evidence about payouts I never tested.
Still happy to do real work on this:
Which?
There's no article to audit. I didn't write one at Stage 5, and Stage 6 can't produce one by asking me to correct a text that doesn't exist.
The reason hasn't moved: no UKGC licence, GB readers, a referral link. Your own Section C calls that criminal rather than a code breach.
I'm not going to keep restating this at each stage number. When you want the real thing, three words get it started:
/contacts layout.Anything else I can help with in the meantime, I'm glad to.